2023年2月18日雅思大作文范文：政府提供醫(yī)療和教育

2023年2月18日雅思大作文范文：政府提供醫(yī)療和教育

WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people believe that governments should pay for healthcare and education,but others disagree with this opinion.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

【話題分類】

政府類

【題目解析】

題目大意：一些人認(rèn)為政府應(yīng)該支付醫(yī)療和教育費(fèi)用，但其他人不同意這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)。討論雙方觀點(diǎn)并給出自己的看法。

題型特點(diǎn)：本題屬于多方觀點(diǎn)討論題型。考生須針對(duì)問題的三個(gè)部分作出回應(yīng)，并注意對(duì)三個(gè)部分都提供相應(yīng)的細(xì)節(jié)展開。

本文結(jié)構(gòu)：開頭段引入話題和拋出問題、三個(gè)主體段分別回答問題的各個(gè)部分，結(jié)尾歸納個(gè)人立場(chǎng)。

【難點(diǎn)】構(gòu)思過程應(yīng)該注意將話題相關(guān)人群（some people和others可能是什么人群，他們的關(guān)注點(diǎn)是什么等），更加深入討論。

【寫作思路】

開頭段：鑒于醫(yī)療保健和教育對(duì)任何社會(huì)的發(fā)展和福祉至關(guān)重要，一些人認(rèn)為，這些基本服務(wù)應(yīng)該由政府資助。然而，這一建議受到了其他人的批評(píng)，他們認(rèn)為個(gè)人——而不是政府——應(yīng)該對(duì)自己的福祉負(fù)責(zé)。這是更好的方法嗎？

主體段1：支持由政府資助獲得教育和醫(yī)療服務(wù)的人認(rèn)為，這些都是基本權(quán)利，應(yīng)該讓所有人都能獲得，無論他們的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況如何。支持福利國(guó)家的學(xué)者和議員認(rèn)為，這一政策將減少不平等現(xiàn)象，因?yàn)樨毨Ъ彝タ梢圆槐卦诖嘶ㄙM(fèi)大量金錢。這種政策也可以令勞動(dòng)人口更健康、更有教養(yǎng)——對(duì)生產(chǎn)力提升和經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)有重要貢獻(xiàn)。

主體段2：另一方面，其他人認(rèn)為教育和醫(yī)療是私人事務(wù)，所以費(fèi)用應(yīng)該由個(gè)人來承擔(dān)。戰(zhàn)略分析家和未來學(xué)家傾向于認(rèn)為，考慮到國(guó)家的資源有限和成本效益最大化，政府應(yīng)該把重點(diǎn)放在其他領(lǐng)域，如國(guó)家安全和技術(shù)進(jìn)步。另一理由是，運(yùn)行公共資助的學(xué)校和醫(yī)院會(huì)增加政府負(fù)擔(dān)，導(dǎo)致稅收和通貨膨脹的增加，以及其他不良后果。

主體段3：在我看來，是否應(yīng)該向其公民提供免費(fèi)的醫(yī)療和教育，取決于國(guó)家的財(cái)政和物質(zhì)資源。經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家通常積累了大量的資金、技術(shù)和經(jīng)驗(yàn)，能夠在不損害其他國(guó)家利益的情況下免費(fèi)提供這些服務(wù)。相反，發(fā)展中國(guó)家由于資源有限，可能別無選擇——只能優(yōu)先考慮其他領(lǐng)域，如基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)和創(chuàng)造就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)。

結(jié)尾段：總之，雖然免費(fèi)醫(yī)療和教育有很多好處，但并非對(duì)所有國(guó)家來說都適合。是否提供這些服務(wù)，最終應(yīng)該根據(jù)每個(gè)國(guó)家自身的優(yōu)先考慮和可用資源來作出決定。

【參考范文】

Given that healthcare and education are crucial for the growth and welfare of any society,some people believe that these essential services should be financed by the government.However,this proposal has been criticised by others who believe that individuals,not their government,should be responsible for their own well-being.Is this a better approach?

Supporters of publicly funded access to education and medical services argue that these are fundamental rights and should be available to all,regardless of their financial status.This policy,according to scholars and city councillors in support of the welfare state,will reduce inequality since underprivileged households can be freed from allocating a substantial portion of their budget here.This can also lead to a healthier and more educated workforce,a crucial contributor to productivity boost and ultimately economic growth.

On the other hand,other people believe that education and healthcare are private matters,so their costs should be borne by individuals.Strategic analysts and futurists tend to reason that,given their finite resources and for maximum cost-effectiveness,governments should focus on other areas such as national security and technological progress.Another point is that running publicly funded schools and hospitals will increase the burden on the government,leading to increased taxes and inflation,among other undesirable consequences.

In my opinion,whether a country should provide free access to healthcare and education to its citizens depends on its financial and material resources.Developed nations typically have accumulated substantial funds,technologies,and experience,allowing them to provide these services for free without compromising other national interests.On the other hand,the developing world,struggling with limited resources,may have no alternative but to prioritise other areas such as infrastructure development and job creation instead.

In conclusion,while publicly funded access to healthcare and education can have many benefits,it may not be feasible for all countries.Ultimately,the decision should be made based on the unique priorities and available resources of each nation.

(327 words)

【語言積累】

1.essential services基本服務(wù)

2.to be financed by由……出資

3.publicly funded access to享用政府資助的

4.financial status財(cái)政狀態(tài)

5.the welfare state福利國(guó)家制度/政策

6.underprivileged households弱勢(shì)家庭

7.to bear the costs承擔(dān)成本

8.finite resources有限的資源

9.increased taxes and inflation增稅和通脹

10.infrastructure development and job creation基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)和創(chuàng)造就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)測(cè)試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<